Sunday, December 18, 2016

The not-very-prolific work of Scott Heim



Twenty years ago, I had an encounter with an author that changed my life. I was reading a new magazine called XY, which was geared toward young gay men and was full of erotic photos by the likes of Howard Roffman and Steven Underhill. It also had lifestyle and culture articles. One of these articles focused on three authors who wrote sexually provocative material. One of those authors was Scott Heim, and it’s not the text of the article that caused me to read his debut novel, Mysterious Skin, but rather the photo (above) of the author at 29. Someone this lovely on the outside had to possess something equally beautiful on the inside, right?

Over the next few years, I would become such a fan that I had an ongoing email correspondence with him, briefly designed and ran his official website (before he needed something more polished and professional), shared some of my creative writing with him, and would later direct Prince Gomolvilas’ adaptation of Mysterious Skin as the first production for my first production company, Book of Dreams. All of this represents some real emotional highs and lows for me, success and failure, and eventually culminated in me not really being the fanboy I once was. Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. 



You may know Mysterious Skin from a 2004 movie with Brady Corbet and Joseph Gordon Levitt. And for what it’s worth, the movie is—for most intents and purposes—very good. I have it, and I like to watch it with daring individuals who like gritty and provocative storytelling. In this way, it represents the novel very well. Of course, there’s a lot more to the book than “gritty and provocative”. It is also full of rich imagery and lyrical beauty. It has the raw emotional punch of ten novels. It’s a rather stunning coming-of-age meditation. It’s a Kansas travelogue, which actually makes the state seem like someplace you’d want to visit. All these things I would consider a trademark of the author.

Mysterious Skin is about two young boys who have essentially the same traumatic experience (sexual abuse by their little league coach) but interpret it in very different ways. Brian blocks out the experience completely, and when fragments of memory start to surface, he believes they are evidence of an alien abduction. Neil, on the other hand, expands on this intro to the adult world of sex by finding lust for his mother’s many boyfriends (who each remind him of idealized Coach), discovering gay porn, and becoming a high school hustler. The novel, in a nutshell, is about the journeys that both boys take from childhood to early adulthood, as they discover the true significance and meaning behind what really happened to them.

Of course, many other interesting characters are introduced along the way: Brian’s prison-guard mom and college sister, Deborah; Neil’s overly-carefree mother and fag-hag best friend Wendy; Eric, the new gay in town who wants a deep connection with Neil, but has to learn that such a thing does not exist. In the novel, Eric is my favorite character, while the movie offered a version less than what I imagined. Then there’s Avalyn, the lonely older woman who Brian reaches out to in his UFO explanation-seeking after she was on a TV show talking about her own abduction experience. All these characters are as vivid and bright as the rural Kansas landscape, eventually juxtaposed with the mean streets and clubs of New York where Neil realizes he can get more money for sex, but ends up with more than he bargained for.

The novel has one of the most brilliant and emotionally satisfying endings I’ve read, even as it leaves you wishing for more. Mysterious Skin was a huge success in the gay lit market, and the film was inevitable, despite the challenges of some pretty graphic and extreme content. What’s more surprising was the play by Gomolvilas, which was actually written before the film, and is different in many ways. I’ve written some about my production of the play, so I’m not going to do that here.

Shortly after I read Mysterious Skin, Scott Heim was at Powell’s doing a tour for his second novel, In Awe. I brought a friend and showed up in my pin-striped baseball jersey style Foetus shirt and sat in the front row, being all geeky and trying to think up not-stupid questions to ask. When I met him and he signed my book, I felt embarrassed like the geeky fanboy that I was.



I’m not sure why I started writing to him after that point. Maybe it’s because I was in fact so dissatisfied with the geeky fanboy meeting. We exchanged several emails before I even finished In Awe. Part of this is because I’ve never been an avid reader anyway, and his self-described maximalist style is sometimes challenging for someone who doesn’t really indulge in a lot of casual reading. He’s very descriptive, and makes the most of each sentence, each paragraph, and really relying on dialogue as little as possible. When I finally finished, I remember not having the words to tell him what the book meant to me. Somehow it overshadowed Mysterious Skin—at least for me, maybe only for me—and that was no small achievement.

In Awe deals with three social pariahs living in Lawrence, Kansas. Boris is a teenager who’s obsessed with a boy at his school named Rex who, unfortunately for Boris, is part of a cadre of dangerous and malicious country rednecks. Sarah is an adult woman, but doesn’t adhere to most of the trappings of adulthood, as she hangs out with Boris, helping him write his prize zombie novel and acting out scenes from horror movies. The third person in this crew is Harriet, an older woman who lost her son Marshall to AIDS-related illness. (Marshall used to be part of the gang of misfits as well.)  Soon, strange and scary incidents start to happen. Acts of horrific violence, coupled with hate crimes raged against this trios of unlikely friends, propel this suspenseful novel to a shattering and breath-taking conclusion.

Alas, In Awe is not as easy to categorize or sum up as Mysterious Skin, nor is it easy for me to explain why it means so much to me as a pivotal work of influence and inspiration in my own life. I couldn’t begin to tell you unless you first read it. It will likely never be filmed, and Scott Heim actually found himself without a publisher in the wake of this less commercially appealing work, as he was in the process of writing his third novel.



After I read In Awe, I was compelled to read his book of poetry, Saved From Drowing, which was actually published before Mysterious Skin was, but in limited numbers, thus kind of hard to find. Heim’s poetry is much like his prose. I would say actually that it is exactly like his prose, but structured into verse form. If you hear it read aloud, you hear a story, not anything that sounds remotely like verse. And indeed, some of the poems in the book found their way into his novels, altered in some cases, sometimes just the central themes remaining. Two of the biggest examples are “Turtle” (which became an incident in Mysterious Skin) and “Brad, Bottom Drawer” (which describes an obsessive behavior very much like Boris behaves with Rex in In Awe). It was a revelation reading these, and seeing how ideas evolve from one thing to another. It was an interesting peek into the creative process.



It took over a decade for Heim to finish his third novel, We Disappear. The finished product ended up becoming his most deeply personal work, as it dealt with depression and the loss of his mother. It concerns the character of “Scott” who comes home, recovering from a drug addiction, to care for his dying mom, Donna. From this framework, Heim adds intrigue reminiscent of his second novel with the discovery of a murdered teenage boy, and the obsession Scott shares with his mother regarding missing persons: collecting articles, playing detective, and trying to imagine possible outcomes.

There is a lot of potential in We Disappear, but for me, its execution falls short. Maybe it’s because Heim is torn between telling a fictional story and writing a memoir of his last days with his mother. There is a shadow of sickness, addiction, depression, and despair that covers this novel, making it a very difficult read if you’re not on the right anti-depressant yourself. There are plot points that don’t pay off. There are questions that don’t get answered…but not in the good way that the first two novels leave you begging for more. This one just kind of ends, and you’re relieved for it. At some point, I want to reread this and see if I have a different reaction. But for now, it’s not a book I recommend.



There is a series of e-books that Heim has published called The First Time I Heard…, in which he and other writers describe their experiences first hearing favorite musicians. I haven’t read any of these, but at least the Kate Bush one is probably fairly interesting.

So, to sum up, if you have never read Mysterious Skin or In Awe, and you’re someone who knows what it’s like to feel like a marginalized person in our society and can relate to material like this, I say get those books now! 

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Comfort and Joy



A few years ago, I was browsing through Samuel French and Dramatists, searching for a Christmas-themed play, particularly a Christmas-themed play with gay characters. One of them I stumbled upon was Comfort and Joy by Jack Heifner. I never actually read it, but I put it on a mental list of plays I might do someday. Fast forward to fall of 2016, and I see that Twilight Theatre Company—arguably the most daring and socially progressive community theatre in the PDX metro—is producing that play. Now, as a rule, when there is a production of one of those plays that I have on the mental list of possibilities, I don’t go see it. The reason being that I don’t want to see someone else’s artistic vision for the piece, and then be unduly influenced by it later. It’s part of how I try to maintain my own greatest level of artistic integrity in my work.

But I made an exception in this case.

Programs were not available opening night because of a misunderstanding with their print shop; this upset me because I feel like that’s part of what you pay for and what you should get with the price of a ticket. Any theatre unable to provide a program should offer to mail their patrons one (a real paper one, not the PDF) at no cost. I have a wonderful box full of 25 years of programs. I always save them, and they’re one of my favorite things. The reason I bring it up here is that I won’t be able to name as many names when discussing the play, unless they are on the Facebook event page; at least the actors are.

Comfort and Joy takes us back at least 20 years to a time when civil liberties for LGBT people were not what they are now, and many in the gay community were still constantly mourning the loss of more and more loved ones by the AIDS epidemic. Its lovable protagonists, Scott (Andy Roberts, who brought joy to HART audiences two years ago in White Christmas) and Tony) are a happily partnered couple, living in a lavish home (not so lavish, actually—more on that later) in the Hollywood Hills, awaiting the arrival of Scott’s harpy mom, Doris (Angela Michtom) for Christmas Eve dinner. Problem: relations between mother and son are already strained, and to add to the festivities, Tony’s obnoxious siblings, Gina and Victor (Adriana Gantzer and Josiah Green, respectively) come to call. She’s pregnant and apparently homeless, and he’s been dumped by his Christian extremist wife, who’s taken off with the kids. To top off this Christmas tree of chaos is a freakish fairy (David Alan Morrison) in silver tights, ghastly blue Crocks and a mess of garish makeup and tattered wings. And yes, the word “fairy” seems to have a double meaning here. He is there to manipulate the characters and shape the outcome of their lives.

If you haven’t already guessed it by now, this is a comedy, but it has its dramatic moments played out with mixed success. I want to single out Morrison’s work as the Fairy because his job is the most challenging. Throughout the play, there are numerous flashbacks to scenes from the various other characters’ lives, and Morrison—as the Fairy—has to occupy all the characters from the past that are being represented, all of which have a huge impact on who these people are today and the demons that haunt them. Morrison brings real depth to all of these characters and showcases an impressive range as an actor. What makes his job even more challenging is that director Jason A. England was not entirely successful in making these sudden scene shifts flow in a clear, concise, and coherent way. The shifts in time were jarring and clunky, causing the audience to have to pause for a moment to figure out, “Okay, where are we and who are we talking to?” This, in spite of an ingenious, hilarious, and very timely lighting design element. (I don’t want to give it away, but this lighting effect, if used in other future shows, will never be as funny of a joke as it is right now.)

As I said before, the two lovers at the center of the story are indeed lovable, and that wouldn’t be possible without the fine performances of Roberts and Torres. What’s interesting here is that you never see the full extent of the chemistry between these men because we’re seeing them on an extraordinarily stressful day when a thousand things get in the way of that. And yet, there is clear proof that the chemistry exists. You get a glimpse here and a glimpse there, and you know from these nuanced performances that these two people have overcome challenging lives and arrived at the kind of happiness that the rest of their family has no ability to understand.

As Dorris, Michtom was appropriately grating, perhaps even a little too much so. Eventually, we see her humanity, but it takes a little longer than it should. This is not solely a script problem. A director and actor can find ways to reveal softness in a character, at least to the audience, if not to the other people on stage. I found there was a similar problem with sister Gina, even though she doesn’t show up until the second act. But the most problematic performance for me was Green’s Victor, who was constantly delivering his lines in a weepy, drunken slur. I would rather he had burst into full blown tears at various points instead of that constant vocal affectation.

The greatest problem I had in terms of the design elements was the set. It had the look of a very generic box set that could be interchanged with hundreds of other living rooms in hundreds of other community theatre productions. It was not remotely evocative of what a Hollywood producer’s residence would be, nor did the décor really reveal much about who the occupants of this home were. On the makeup front, the Doris character was supposed to have had a recent facelift; there seemed to be no effort taken to convey this.

But plays are about people, not nearly as much as what they wear or the places they occupy (though those things can be important sometimes). If you care about the people on stage, then the production is doing its job. Relatives can be annoying at times, but one of the things the holidays are about is being able to overlook those faults, forgive, and recognize the things we have in common. All of the performers in Comfort and Joy were able to conjure moments of empathy and compassion for their characters, which made up for the other inconsistencies.

Before seeing the show, I saw a Facebook post about this production. I’m not sure if it was the director or somebody else posting it, but essentially they talked about how, although the play is a product of the 90s, it is still relevant to today. Of course, in the post-2016 election, as we face the upcoming Trump administration, many people are afraid that civil rights and our culture of inclusion will be dialed way back. Personally, I don’t share this fear, but I acknowledge the concern and believe it’s an important conversation to have. In producing Comfort and Joy, Twilight Theatre Company has done a service to advance the discussion in a healthy and productive way.